Connected Home
Home   

Networking   

Home Controls   

Mobile   

Home Office   


Visual   

Home Theater   

Xbox   

N-Gage   

Search   

Forums   

<-- prev. page     [1] 2 3     next page -->

March 23, 2004  |  Jake Ludington  |  Feature Articles
The Best A/V Receivers on the Market

The receiver at the center of my home theater system is showing its age. I bought it back in my post-college apartment days, and its six 100-watt audio channels and Dolby Pro Logic encoders—combined with JBL surround speakers—blew my budget. Its humble audio and video connections are composite RCA. Today, my DVD player routes component video to inputs on the TV, with audio routing to the receiver—a compromise to improve overall quality. The original speakers are long gone, but that sub-par receiver still sits in my living room. In fact, the receiver is the only piece of my system that's more than 2 years old.

Contrast my antiquated receiver with my PC setup. My home office sports a 7.1-surround configuration of studio-grade reference monitors meticulously positioned for optimal listening. DTS and Dolby Digital 5.1 EX surround processing make movie viewing on a 21" LCD monitor an intense experience. With a USB add-on, even my widescreen laptop outputs 7.1 surround sound. Guess where I spend most of my time?

For some reason, my fiancée is reluctant to join me at the desktop for an evening of movies and popcorn. She's convinced the couch is more comfortable. Sure, the TV screen is much bigger and we can sit side-by-side, but my ears are left craving a more complete audio experience. So, while my better half arranges our bridal registry and shops for bridesmaid dresses, I'm thinking about upgrading the receiver in our home theater setup.

Time to Shop
Before I begin receiver shopping, I need to decide what features I want. First, I want something I can live with for at least 3 years. Therefore, I need a receiver that can deliver the latest in surround-sound processing. Upgrading my office sound system from 5.1 to 7.1 improved sound perceptibly, so exploring anything less for the living room would lead to disappointment.

Surprisingly, maximum watts per channel make little difference in audio quality across the available 7.1 options—at least as far as my ears can tell. With all speakers being equal, turning up a 110-watt receiver to levels at the high end of my listening threshold resulted in audio quality negligibly different from a receiver that offers 55 watts per channel. Car chases, jazz licks, and crunchy guitars all sound great at either power level.

For my testing, I used the DTS Surround track on The Fast and the Furious DVD and the Dolby Digital EX track from Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace. Although neither film is a huge cinematic achievement, the audio in each case is far above average. The Fast and the Furious has some of the most aggressive sound effects ever to come out of Hollywood. The Phantom Menace is the first (and arguably the best) implementation of Dolby Digital EX. I also listened to a few in-store DVD-Audio (DVD-A) selections, which sound amazing but don't really fit my musical tastes.

I don't yet have HDTV in my house, but I've already had occasion to drool over picture quality, so the receiver I choose needs sufficient bandwidth for HD signal processing. All my video-playback devices, with the exception of my digital video camera, have component-out capability and digital audio connections, so both connection types are must-haves on my shopping itinerary. Virtually every receiver in this class supports six or more analog inputs for DVD-A and SACD components.

One major difference among receivers is whether they switch component-video connections through one common output to the TV, in addition to sampling video up from S-video and composite to component out. Switching of component-video connections through a common output lets you make only one component connection out to the TV from the receiver, whereas upsampling takes lower signal-quality S-video and composite connections and passes them out to the TV through component connections, which also means fewer wires running behind the entertainment center. When you already have wires running to the DVD player, a CD changer, a record player, a VCR, an AudioTron, and a Tivo, any reduction in wiring is welcome.

Another feature of note is THX Surround EX 7.1 decoding. You might ask, Isn't THX just a certification process? That's only partially true. THX Surround EX 7.1 is available only in THX-certified receivers and amplifiers. It represents a custom THX decoding process for Dolby Digital EX-encoded sound, requiring a 7.1 speaker configuration with two additional rear speakers to recreate the center-back surround channel. This two-speaker rear-channel configuration is a mono pairing, with both speakers outputting the same audio. The decoding process is similar to the way Dolby Pro Logic interprets stereo sound as surround, extrapolating the audio from a surround configuration and adding rear-channel information. THX refers to THX Surround EX as a 5.1 "enhancement" rather than a full-blown processing specification, but Dolby Digital EX sounds different when decoded with anything other than THX Surround EX 7.1. Availability of this feature doesn't start appearing until you look at receivers above the $999 level.

In preliminary comparisons, most LCD remote control interfaces seem convoluted. Battery life can be a problem, too. With other major factors being equal, receivers with LCD remotes are typically $100 more expensive than similar units that offer the more mundane pushbutton variety. Remote style is a matter of personal taste. As a group, pushbutton remotes remain more intuitive, especially when the receiver supports onscreen programming through the TV.

I'm hopeful that more and more component manufacturers will begin directly integrating Internet radio and XM broadcasts into the home theater environment. As much as I enjoy listening to This American Life on NPR, the 40 FM presets included on most receivers is becoming more and more silly. Music broadcasts are digital events in my world. XM is essential for the connected home, and streaming audio downloads to the home theater would certainly make them more attractive. So far, Onkyo is the only company addressing this situation—although I didn't find any receiver with built-in XM and 7.1 surround. For the time being, my current setup includes separate devices for streaming XM and Internet audio.



<-- prev. page     [1] 2 3     next page -->

Article Information
Email this Article

Printer-Friendly



Reader Comments    
 


Very good article with the exception of a demonstrated lack of understanding of the benefits of increased amplifier power. I suppose he will learn that increased power is of more benefit to your speakers than to actual increase in sound quality on the day he blows out his speakers due to overdriving the amplifier.

Chris Norris -March 24, 2004



Hi Jake, Be sure to republish when receivers come out with 1) Web control interface (a la Audiotron). My existing receiver is your vintage, and I use it to run whole house audio (one zone). Let's control these from our PCs.

2) DVI output to the monitor instead of component. I just got a Samsung DLP with DVI input and it's remarkable - fully digital from DVD player to display.

Sean Deuby -March 24, 2004



Jake, Another option for internet radio is to utilize your Tivo with Home Media Option. Skip Tivo's HMO PC software and install the open source JavaHMO server that includes Shoutcast streaming radio along with a few other improvements over Tivo's HMO server software.

Mark Hall -March 24, 2004



Linksys - a Division of Cisco Systems, Inc. - Press release in 2003 Cisco Systems Announces Agreement to Acquire The Linksys Group, Inc. SAN JOSE, Calif., March 20, 2003 - Cisco Systems, Inc., today announced a definitive agreement to acquire the business of privately held The Linksys Group, Inc. of Irvine, Calif.

Kerry Walsh -March 24, 2004



To address Chris's comment on amplifier power: The only time you need to worry about damaging speakers with an underpowered amplifier is when the amplifier is turned up to the point of clipping the audio. I love to listen to music at levels where I can feel bass hitting me in the chest. I have yet to increase the volume on an amplifier in any price point to a level I could both sustain listening to the output and push the amplifer to the point of clipping.

Jake Ludington -March 24, 2004



As an old engineer and audiophile/pile?, would it take so much to educate your readers and at the same time put all the device specs into your review?

In reading the responses I read, there are so many fallacies in the information given by some of the responders, you’re doing a disservice to your readers.

Why aren’t the following listed? : THD: Total Harmonic Distortion (Measured at RMS clipping point) ; IMD: Inter-Modulation Distortion [(List Frequencies used) (Measured at various input and output power levels with an attached 4 ohm load*)] RMS Power Out RootMeanSquare (Usually ~0.707 of the peak power w/sine wave input) {[(Measured @ clipping point of a Triangular and/or Sine Wave)] and [(Monitor XOVR Crossover Distortion @ Output and Input of amplifier) and (Observe any distortion of Triangular, Sine, and Square Waves: Anomalies as in wiggles in the waveform lines)

ETC: ---------------------------------- There are also some fallacies in how loudspeakers and power interact.

Setting the Stage:

Crude Theory of Operation of Woofers in Two Configurations: Most of today’s speakers are sealed, read inefficient; so that the bass of a larger/more efficient speaker can be reproduced. The ‘standing waves’** in the sealed cabinet dampens*** the woofer so that the speaker’s voice coil doesn’t jump off its suspension. I’m sure some us great unwashed out here in INet Land, have pushed on a woofer cone that scraps when pushed. You know; that raspy sounding channel? We all live with these speakers in our cars and sometimes with most of the speakers sold today. All in the name of saving space. Keep in mind that the sealed speaker is actually an air pump, and the inside of the cabinet should be lined with insulation to help absorb the reflected waves and keep the enclosure from rattling, etc.

An efficient woofer can be seen in speakers like the Klipsch Corner Horn and perhaps a rare few others. Basically the woofer is in a cavity that is made large enough to be resonant**** at about 100 Hertz. The cavity is usually vented (open) usually to the front. In a nutshell, this configuration requires less power to move the woofer cone in and out, reproducing a sound wave. You can feed these speakers with a low power source (amplifier) and still get high quality bass sound from the speaker.

How Much Power Does My Amplifier Need? : Inventory |

a) 1 - 100 Watt Amplifier with 1.0% THD b) 1 - 50 Watt Amplifier with 1.0% THD c) 1 - Sealed Woofer System d) 1 - Efficient Woofer System e) 1 - Sound Pressure Meter (Look in a Radio Shack Catalog) f) 1 - Measuring setup as above.

Now we just cut to the simplification to save time and space……..

If I measure the 100 Watt Amplifier setup with the ‘Sealed Woofer System’ at a 20 Decibel room level (on the Sound Pressure Meter), I have to turn up the amplifier to its 50 watt output level. The distortion level at half power should be one half of 1.0%; 0.5% distortion.

If I measure the 50 Watt Amplifier setup with the ‘Efficient Woofer System’ at a 20 Decibel room level (on the Sound Pressure Meter), I only have to turn up the amplifier to its 25 watt output level. Again, the distortion level at half power should be one half of 1.0%; 0.5% distortion.

If I measure the 100 Watt Amplifier setup with the ‘Efficient Woofer System’ at a 20 Decibel room level (on the Sound Pressure Meter), I only have to turn up the amplifier to its 25 watt output level. The distortion level at half power should be one quarter of 1.0%; 0.25% distortion.

I simplified the numbers, but I hope the concept is clear.

The reason I stuck with the amplifier is that I agree with the use of the computer to feed a stand alone amplifier; as opposed to a receiver. If you use a high end sound card, the input source to the amplifier, your PC, has a lot more potential usability than any receiver. All you are paying for in a receiver is the dedicated circuitry that your PC and software can easily do; usually better.

Enough for now, you’re likely all asleep by now.

Thanks for my letting me ramble. I hope this clarifies things a bit.

* with an attached 4 ohm load This is actually an reactive (AC Resistance) load, but measurements in test configurations are done with high wattage rated ceramic [(non-wire wound resistors) (non reactive resistors);

** standing waves These reflected waves that cause internal resistance to the speakers cone movement;

*** dampens Bucks/restricts the movement of the speaker cone by the internal sound pressure waves pushing against the cone;

**** large enough to be resonant The point where the speaker produces its lowest frequency, this is also the frequency that is the correct size for the speakers cavity. The reactive load should measure the speaker’s rating; such as 4 ohms.

Thanks, Duane

Duane Cook -March 25, 2004



I enjoyed reading this article, although it did not really give an in-depth review on each of the receivers.

Reading Duane's comments really triggered me to write this. There was so much misleading information that I just could not hold but point out a few. - The distortion percentage of an amplifier is not linearly proportional to the output power. In othe words, the higher the power does not necessarily bring more distortion. - The definition of standing wave was all wrong. It should not be difficult to find the correct definition over the Internet, so I am not trying to be the professor here. - The explanation of "air suspension" and "bass reflex" types of speaker box design was also not incorrect.

Thanks, LC

Leo Chan -May 4, 2004



The article is praticaly comparing apples&oranges, at least compare competivly priced recievers from each company or one companies range of recievers. For the price ($1199) Denon's 3805 does 90%+ of the 5803A($4000+)and is way less then half the price.Plus its available in black OR silver(really gun metal gray brushed aluminum) Blows away everything below and most recievers costing a $1000 more. With 3 room multi source, 100mh componant bandwidth(hdtv) componant bandwidth you just can't beat it. Plus it has a available mic for easy set up!

JOHNNY-BOY -June 30, 2004



I think there are a lot of people that think they know everything, and you guys are great. The only thing I know is that if you plan of pying 4000 for a receiver make sure you do the homework .. and if you buy a 300 dollar receiver you get what you pay for. Going to Radio shack to get a measuring tool ?? what is that all about just hook it up and enjoy the people that build this stuff know what the exact specifics are and you get what you pay for.

SEAN -May 31, 2005



graet article. greater commentary. love it.

prem Karunakaran -June 9, 2007



So, the Sprocket actuates around the Johnson Rod. This in turn occilates the counterleaver and makes the polonoids increase their wave throughput which gives more intensitity to the ondulating bars. I got it now. I will just stick to the out of the box stuff. Well

Well -October 6, 2007



prem karunakaran? I know you! http://www.promotionbelt.ca

jim -February 29, 2008



Prem Karunakaran??? I know you too!! http://trewo.org/

Bob -March 4, 2008



gay azz shithead

charabusce -June 5, 2008



Your Comments (required):

Name (required): -October 8, 2008


READER COMMENTS:
We want to hear what you have to say about this article!
    Acceptable Use Policy

Your email is only used if our editors need to contact you. It is not used or stored for any other purpose, nor posted with your comments.

Enter the text from the image below


Please refresh the page if you have trouble reading this text.




Home   |   About Us   |   Contact Us / Customer Service   |   Media Kit

Windows IT Pro   |   SQL Server Magazine   |   Left-Brain.com   |   Supersite for Windows   |   asp.netPRO
FAQ for Windows   |   WinInfo News   |   Windows IT Pro Europe   |   Office & SharePoint Pro   |   DevProConnections

Connected Home is a division of Penton Media, Inc.

© 2010 Penton Media, Inc. Terms of Use | Privacy Statement |